Saltar al contenido
  • Home
  • Quienes somos
    • Líneas de investigación
  • Extensión y Difusión
    • SPEF
      • Programa de Servicio Social
  • Proyectos de Investigación
  • Publicaciones
  • Contacto
  • Search

Estudios Fronterizos Border Studies

Grupo de investigación sobre fronteras y migraciones de la UACM

Estudios Fronterizos

A Path to Citizenship, Hillary Clinton Says, ‘Is at Its Heart a Family Issue’ / The New York Times

Fecha: mayo 24, 2015Autor/a: Estudios Fronterizos Grupo de Investigación UACM 0 Comentarios
By Amy Chozick

LAS VEGAS — For months, Latino activists frustrated by President Obama’s inability to overhaul the immigration system have pressed Hillary Rodham Clinton about what she would do differently.

On Tuesday, she tried to answer those pleas. At a campaign event here, Mrs. Clinton, surrounded by children whose parents faced deportation, called for a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.

“We have to finally, once and for all, fix our immigration system,” Mrs. Clinton said at a round-table discussion at Rancho High School, where roughly 70 percent of the study body is Latino.

“It’s a family issue,” Mrs. Clinton said. “It’s an economic issue, too, but it is at its heart a family issue.”

She said that she supported Mr. Obama’s executive actions on immigration and that it was “foolish” to think the government could deport the estimated 11 million people who are living in the United States without papers.

She also sharply criticized Republican presidential candidates who favor granting legal status for some undocumented immigrants, but oppose citizenship.

“When they talk about ‘legal status,’ that is code for ‘second-class status,’” Mrs. Clinton said.

Many Republicans have criticized Mr. Obama’s plans for an overhaul as amnesty, a position the party’s conservative base shares. But candidates must tread carefully.

Former Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida, whose wife is from Mexico, has said he supports a comprehensive immigration overhaul, but his aides have said he prefers a path to legal status.

Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, a Republican who is of Cuban descent, has backed away from his 2013 support for a comprehensive immigration overhaul bill, saying he would support a path to citizenship only if it followed tougher border enforcement laws.

Many of the students selected to participate in the discussion with Mrs. Clinton have parents facing deportation, but they themselves are eligible to apply for legal status. Astrid Silva, a 26-year-old who arrived from Mexico at age 4 and who Mr. Obama talked about in a televised immigration address in November, moderated the panel.

Ms. Silva and four of the other participants had been granted a stay from deportation under Mr. Obama’s 2012 program, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, which Mrs. Clinton said she supported.

She also called for reform of immigration enforcement practices “so that they’re more humane, targeted and effective” and for wholesale changes to detention facilities, which are privatized and, she said, often get paid per bed that is filled.

In her 2008 campaign, Mrs. Clinton won 63 percent of the Latino vote in the 16 Super Tuesday contests, compared with 35 percent for Mr. Obama. But since, she has been a subject of scrutiny, as immigration activists have grown increasingly frustrated with both parties.

Last June, Mrs. Clinton told CNN that the Central American children who crossed the Mexican border into the United States “should be sent back as soon as it can be determined who responsible adults in their families are,” a comment that angered some young Latinos. (Mrs. Clinton later said that only those children without a family connection in the United States or another legitimate claim for asylum should be sent back.)

While campaigning on behalf of Democrats ahead of the midterm elections last year, Mrs. Clinton was dogged by young immigration activists to commit to reform.

After Democrats suffered significant losses in the midterm elections, Mr. Obama moved forward later in November with executive actions to protect millions of people from being deported, but those initiatives have been held up by a federal court.

Unlike Mr. Obama, who vowed in his campaign to pass an immigration bill in his first year in the White House, Mrs. Clinton would not commit to a firm timeline. She pointed to the 2008 financial crisis and all the unknowns of the Oval Office, but reiterated her belief that “we are a nation of immigrants” and that reform would be a high priority.

The speech played well among advocates for immigration reform who have been critical of Mrs. Clinton in the past.

“Wow. Hillary Clinton just bear-hugged immigrants and the immigration issue in a way that could shake up the entire 2016 race,” said Frank Sharry, executive director of America’s Voice, an advocacy group.

Follow The New York Times Politics and Washington on Facebook and Twitter, and sign up for the First Draft politics newsletter.

Correction: May 5, 2015
An earlier version of this article misidentified the speech in which Mr. Obama mentioned Astrid Silva, an immigrant from Mexico who moderated a panel discussion with Hillary Rodham Clinton on Tuesday. It was a televised immigration address in November, it was not the State of the Union.

A version of this article appears in print on 05/06/2015, on page A17 of the NewYork edition with the headline: Saying System Is Broken, Clinton Pledges Action on Immigration.

Comparte esto:

  • Haz clic para compartir en Skype (Se abre en una ventana nueva)
  • Haz clic para compartir en WhatsApp (Se abre en una ventana nueva)
  • Haz clic para enviar por correo electrónico a un amigo (Se abre en una ventana nueva)
  • Haz clic para compartir en Telegram (Se abre en una ventana nueva)
  • Haz clic para compartir en Facebook (Se abre en una ventana nueva)
  • Haz clic para imprimir (Se abre en una ventana nueva)
  • Haz clic para compartir en Twitter (Se abre en una ventana nueva)
  • Haz clic para compartir en LinkedIn (Se abre en una ventana nueva)

Me gusta esto:

Me gusta Cargando...

Relacionado

Navegación de entradas

Anterior Entrada anterior: Abandonados en alta mar / periodismo humano
Siguiente Entrada siguiente: Europe’s boat people / The Economist

Deja un comentario Cancelar respuesta

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Gravatar
Logo de WordPress.com

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. ( Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Google photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google. ( Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. ( Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. ( Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Cancelar

Conectando a %s

Publicaciones del grupo

El pase de diapositivas requiere JavaScript.

Entradas y Páginas Populares

  • ¿Qué es la frontera? por Roxana Rodríguez Ortiz
  • México: las rutas de los migrantes que no pueden viajar en La Bestia / BBC
  • Quienes somos
  • 30.000 inmigrantes aguardan en Marruecos para saltar a Ceuta y Melilla / El País
  • FRANCK DÜVELL (2014). TRANSIT MIGRATION IN EUROPE / IMISCOE

Instagram

Follow me on Twitter

Mis tuits
Follow Estudios Fronterizos Border Studies on WordPress.com

Licencia de Creative Commons
EstudiosFronterizos.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional License.

© 2021 Estudios Fronterizos Border Studies

Crea tu propio blog con WordPress.com.

loading Cancelar
La entrada no fue enviada. ¡Comprueba tus direcciones de correo electrónico!
Error en la comprobación de email. Por favor, vuelve a intentarlo
Lo sentimos, tu blog no puede compartir entradas por correo electrónico.
Cancelar
A %d blogueros les gusta esto: